<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Response to sharecropping..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ahinson7.edublogs.org/2008/04/17/89/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ahinson7.edublogs.org/2008/04/17/89/</link>
	<description>Education, Technology and Culture...from a country girl</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 01:16:25 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: D'Arcy Norman</title>
		<link>http://ahinson7.edublogs.org/2008/04/17/89/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>D'Arcy Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ahinson7.edublogs.org/2008/04/17/89/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s NOT about money. Well, not completely, anyway. It&#039;s about giving control, even ownership in some cases, of our content to a third party. To any third party.  If the content we produce has any meaning, any value (however that is measured - and it&#039;s not just financial), then how can we justify giving it to anyone? Especially when the tools that are used to publish, manage, and present the content are so trivially available to anyone who wants them?

It&#039;s not about money. It&#039;s about control. It&#039;s about ownership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s NOT about money. Well, not completely, anyway. It&#8217;s about giving control, even ownership in some cases, of our content to a third party. To any third party.  If the content we produce has any meaning, any value (however that is measured &#8211; and it&#8217;s not just financial), then how can we justify giving it to anyone? Especially when the tools that are used to publish, manage, and present the content are so trivially available to anyone who wants them?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not about money. It&#8217;s about control. It&#8217;s about ownership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
